Manuscript endorsements and human review
The deterministic engine handles standard ISO/AAIS forms and dec-page numbers. Non-standard, carrier-drafted (manuscript) language is deliberately routed to a human — this page explains why and how.
Why manuscript language isn't auto-judged
A manuscript endorsement has no library meaning — two with similar titles can do opposite things. Auto-interpreting bespoke wording is where automated systems are least reliable and the coverage stakes are highest, so BindCheck detects it, flags it, and puts it in front of you rather than guessing.
The review-required flag
When a check contains a manuscript endorsement (or another item the engine wants confirmed), the check is marked review-required and the relevant finding lands in the manuscript or review category. The check isn't 'done and clean' until a person has read the flagged language and recorded a decision.
How to work a review
Open the flagged finding, jump to the referenced policy, read the actual endorsement text against what the account needs, and set the finding's verdict. That recorded human decision is the point — it's what keeps the review defensible and keeps judgment where it belongs.